Fish LingcodvsMangos
🎯When to Eat What
Goal-based picks for Fish Lingcod vs Mangos
Go with Mangos at just 60 kcal per 100g — 29% fewer calories.
Fish Lingcod will keep you satisfied longer with 17.7g protein — fat and protein slow digestion while fiber adds bulk, keeping hunger at bay.
Fish Lingcod packs 17.7g of protein per 100g (83% of calories from protein) — the better pick for muscle growth and recovery.
Mangos is the heart-friendlier option with lower saturated fat, less sodium, more fiber.
Fish Lingcod provides 437mg of potassium per 100g — important for muscle function, hydration, and blood pressure.
Mangos delivers 36mg of vitamin C per 100g — great for immune function and skin health.
🔥Calorie Breakdown
💪Macronutrient Comparison
📊Full Nutrition Comparison
| Nutrient | Fish Lingcod | Mangos | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💪Macronutrients | |||
| Calories | 85kcal4% | 60kcal3% | +25kcal |
| Protein | 18g35% | 0.82g2% | +17g |
| Total Fat | 1.1g1% | 0.38g0% | +0.68g |
| Saturated Fat | 0.20g1% | <0.1g0% | +0.11g |
| Trans Fat | — | 0g | — |
| Cholesterol | 52mg17% | 0mg0% | +52mg |
| Carbohydrates | 0g0% | 15g5% | <0.1g |
| Dietary Fiber | 0g0% | 1.6g6% | <0.1g |
| Sugars | — | 14g | — |
| ✨Vitamins | |||
| Vitamin A | 15mcg2% | 54mcg6% | <0.1mcg |
| Vitamin C | 0mg0% | 36mg40% | <0.1mg |
| Vitamin D | — | 0mcg0% | — |
| Vitamin E | — | 0.90mg6% | — |
| Vitamin K | — | 4.2mcg4% | — |
| Vitamin B6 | 0.30mg18% | 0.12mg7% | +0.18mg |
| Vitamin B12 | 3.6mcg150% | 0mcg0% | +3.6mcg |
| Folate | 9.0mcg2% | 43mcg11% | <0.1mcg |
| Thiamin (B1) | <0.1mg3% | <0.1mg2% | +<0.1mg |
| Riboflavin (B2) | 0.11mg9% | <0.1mg3% | +<0.1mg |
| Niacin (B3) | 1.9mg12% | 0.67mg4% | +1.2mg |
| 🔶Minerals | |||
| Sodium | 59mg3% | 1.0mg0% | +58mg |
| Calcium | 14mg1% | 11mg1% | +3.0mg |
| Iron | 0.32mg2% | 0.16mg1% | +0.16mg |
| Potassium | 437mg9% | 168mg4% | +269mg |
| Phosphorus | 201mg16% | 14mg1% | +187mg |
| Magnesium | 26mg6% | 10mg2% | +16mg |
| Zinc | 0.45mg4% | <0.1mg1% | +0.36mg |
| Copper | <0.1mg3% | 0.11mg12% | <0.1mg |
| Manganese | <0.1mg1% | <0.1mg3% | <0.1mg |
| Selenium | 37mcg66% | 0.60mcg1% | +36mcg |
🔬Nutritional Analysis
Calories: Mangos is significantly lower in calories at just 60 kcal per 100g compared to 85 kcal for Fish Lingcod — that's 42% fewer calories, making Mangos the better choice for calorie-conscious diets.
Protein: Fish Lingcod provides more protein with 17.7g versus 0.82g per 100g. In terms of protein-to-calorie efficiency, Fish Lingcod offers better value for building and maintaining muscle.
Fat: Fish Lingcod has more fat (1.06g vs 0.38g per 100g), but the combination of fat and protein makes it more satiating — dietary fat helps absorb fat-soluble vitamins (A, D, E, K) and supports hormone balance.
Key Vitamins: The most notable vitamin differences are in Vitamin C (Mangos: 36.4mg vs 0mg), Vitamin B12 (Fish Lingcod: 3.6mcg vs 0mcg), Folate (Mangos: 43mcg vs 9mcg).
Key Minerals: Notable mineral differences include Sodium (Fish Lingcod: 59mg vs 1mg), Selenium (Fish Lingcod: 36.5mcg vs 0.6mcg), Phosphorus (Fish Lingcod: 201mg vs 14mg).
Diet Suitability: Fish Lingcod fits a low-carb or keto diet. Both fit a low-fat diet. Both fit a low-sodium diet.