Fish Tuna SaladvsMangos
🎯When to Eat What
Goal-based picks for Fish Tuna Salad vs Mangos
Go with Mangos at just 60 kcal per 100g — 68% fewer calories.
Fish Tuna Salad will keep you satisfied longer with 16g protein, 9.26g fat — fat and protein slow digestion while fiber adds bulk, keeping hunger at bay.
Fish Tuna Salad packs 16g of protein per 100g (34% of calories from protein) — the better pick for muscle growth and recovery.
Mangos is the heart-friendlier option with lower saturated fat, less sodium, more fiber.
Mangos delivers 36mg of vitamin C per 100g — great for immune function and skin health.
Fish Tuna Salad has only 9g of carbs per 100g, making it the clear choice for low-carb and ketogenic diets.
🔥Calorie Breakdown
💪Macronutrient Comparison
📊Full Nutrition Comparison
| Nutrient | Fish Tuna Salad | Mangos | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💪Macronutrients | |||
| Calories | 187kcal9% | 60kcal3% | +127kcal |
| Protein | 16g32% | 0.82g2% | +15g |
| Total Fat | 9.3g12% | 0.38g0% | +8.9g |
| Saturated Fat | 1.5g8% | <0.1g0% | +1.4g |
| Trans Fat | — | 0g | — |
| Cholesterol | 13mg4% | 0mg0% | +13mg |
| Carbohydrates | 9.4g3% | 15g5% | <0.1g |
| Dietary Fiber | 0g0% | 1.6g6% | <0.1g |
| Sugars | — | 14g | — |
| ✨Vitamins | |||
| Vitamin A | 24mcg3% | 54mcg6% | <0.1mcg |
| Vitamin C | 2.2mg2% | 36mg40% | <0.1mg |
| Vitamin D | — | 0mcg0% | — |
| Vitamin E | — | 0.90mg6% | — |
| Vitamin K | — | 4.2mcg4% | — |
| Vitamin B6 | <0.1mg5% | 0.12mg7% | <0.1mg |
| Vitamin B12 | 1.2mcg50% | 0mcg0% | +1.2mcg |
| Folate | 8.0mcg2% | 43mcg11% | <0.1mcg |
| Thiamin (B1) | <0.1mg3% | <0.1mg2% | +<0.1mg |
| Riboflavin (B2) | <0.1mg5% | <0.1mg3% | +<0.1mg |
| Niacin (B3) | 6.7mg42% | 0.67mg4% | +6.0mg |
| 🔶Minerals | |||
| Sodium | 402mg17% | 1.0mg0% | +401mg |
| Calcium | 17mg1% | 11mg1% | +6.0mg |
| Iron | 1.0mg6% | 0.16mg1% | +0.84mg |
| Potassium | 178mg4% | 168mg4% | +10mg |
| Phosphorus | 178mg14% | 14mg1% | +164mg |
| Magnesium | 19mg5% | 10mg2% | +9.0mg |
| Zinc | 0.56mg5% | <0.1mg1% | +0.47mg |
| Copper | 0.14mg16% | 0.11mg12% | +<0.1mg |
| Manganese | <0.1mg2% | <0.1mg3% | <0.1mg |
| Selenium | 41mcg75% | 0.60mcg1% | +41mcg |
🔬Nutritional Analysis
Calories: Mangos is significantly lower in calories at just 60 kcal per 100g compared to 187 kcal for Fish Tuna Salad — that's 212% fewer calories, making Mangos the better choice for calorie-conscious diets.
Protein: Fish Tuna Salad provides more protein with 16g versus 0.82g per 100g. In terms of protein-to-calorie efficiency, Fish Tuna Salad offers better value for building and maintaining muscle.
Fat: Fish Tuna Salad has more fat (9.26g vs 0.38g per 100g), but the combination of fat and protein makes it more satiating — dietary fat helps absorb fat-soluble vitamins (A, D, E, K) and supports hormone balance. Mangos has less saturated fat (0.092g vs 1.54g).
Key Vitamins: The most notable vitamin differences are in Vitamin B12 (Fish Tuna Salad: 1.2mcg vs 0mcg), Vitamin C (Mangos: 36.4mg vs 2.2mg), Niacin (B3) (Fish Tuna Salad: 6.7mg vs 0.669mg).
Key Minerals: Notable mineral differences include Sodium (Fish Tuna Salad: 402mg vs 1mg), Selenium (Fish Tuna Salad: 41.2mcg vs 0.6mcg), Phosphorus (Fish Tuna Salad: 178mg vs 14mg).
Diet Suitability: Mangos fits a low-fat diet. Mangos fits a low-sodium diet.