Fish LingcodvsPork Loin Backribs Bone-in Lean Only

Pork Loin Backribs Bone-in Lean Only has more protein, Fish Lingcod is lower in calories, while Pork Loin Backribs Bone-in Lean Only has more healthy fats for satiety.

🎯When to Eat What

Goal-based picks for Fish Lingcod vs Pork Loin Backribs Bone-in Lean Only

⚖️Watching your weight

Go with Fish Lingcod at just 85 kcal per 100g — 51% fewer calories.

🫄Staying full longer

Pork Loin Backribs Bone-in Lean Only will keep you satisfied longer with 20.8g protein, 9.84g fat — fat and protein slow digestion while fiber adds bulk, keeping hunger at bay.

🥛Nutrient absorption

Pork Loin Backribs Bone-in Lean Only's natural fat (9.84g/100g) helps your body absorb fat-soluble nutrients like vitamin D — not all fat is bad, moderate amounts are essential.

💪Building muscle

Pork Loin Backribs Bone-in Lean Only packs 20.8g of protein per 100g (48% of calories from protein) — the better pick for muscle growth and recovery.

❤️Heart health

Fish Lingcod is the heart-friendlier option with lower saturated fat, less sodium, more potassium.

🍌Electrolytes & cramp prevention

Fish Lingcod provides 437mg of potassium per 100g — important for muscle function, hydration, and blood pressure.

🔥Calorie Breakdown

Fish Lingcod
85kcal
Protein88%
Carbs0%
Fat12%
Pork Loin Backribs Bone-in Lean Only
172kcal
Protein48%
Carbs0%
Fat52%

💪Macronutrient Comparison

Fish LingcodPork Loin Backribs Bone-in Lean Only
ProteinB Wins
18g
21g
Carbohydrates
0g
0g
Total FatA Wins
1.1g
9.8g
Dietary Fiber
0g
0g

📊Full Nutrition Comparison

NutrientFish LingcodPork Loin Backribs Bone-in Lean OnlyDiff
💪Macronutrients
Calories85kcal4%172kcal9%<0.1kcal
Protein18g35%21g42%<0.1g
Total Fat1.1g1%9.8g13%<0.1g
Saturated Fat0.20g1%3.5g17%<0.1g
Trans Fat<0.1g
Cholesterol52mg17%66mg22%<0.1mg
Carbohydrates0g0%0g0%
Dietary Fiber0g0%0g0%
Sugars0g
Vitamins
Vitamin A15mcg2%3.0mcg0%+12mcg
Vitamin C0mg0%0mg0%
Vitamin D0.90mcg5%
Vitamin E0.20mg1%
Vitamin K0mcg0%
Vitamin B60.30mg18%0.47mg27%<0.1mg
Vitamin B123.6mcg150%0.54mcg23%+3.1mcg
Folate9.0mcg2%0mcg0%+9.0mcg
Thiamin (B1)<0.1mg3%0.50mg41%<0.1mg
Riboflavin (B2)0.11mg9%0.33mg25%<0.1mg
Niacin (B3)1.9mg12%7.3mg45%<0.1mg
🔶Minerals
Sodium59mg3%95mg4%<0.1mg
Calcium14mg1%26mg2%<0.1mg
Iron0.32mg2%0.84mg5%<0.1mg
Potassium437mg9%268mg6%+169mg
Phosphorus201mg16%165mg13%+36mg
Magnesium26mg6%17mg4%+9.0mg
Zinc0.45mg4%2.7mg25%<0.1mg
Copper<0.1mg3%<0.1mg10%<0.1mg
Manganese<0.1mg1%<0.1mg0%+<0.1mg
Selenium37mcg66%33mcg61%+3.2mcg

🔬Nutritional Analysis

Calories: Fish Lingcod is significantly lower in calories at just 85 kcal per 100g compared to 172 kcal for Pork Loin Backribs Bone-in Lean Only — that's 102% fewer calories, making Fish Lingcod the better choice for calorie-conscious diets.

Protein: Pork Loin Backribs Bone-in Lean Only provides more protein with 20.8g versus 17.7g per 100g. In terms of protein-to-calorie efficiency, Fish Lingcod offers better value for building and maintaining muscle.

Fat: Pork Loin Backribs Bone-in Lean Only has more fat (9.84g vs 1.06g per 100g), but the combination of fat and protein makes it more satiating — dietary fat helps absorb fat-soluble vitamins (A, D, E, K) and supports hormone balance. Fish Lingcod has less saturated fat (0.197g vs 3.48g).

Key Vitamins: The most notable vitamin differences are in Folate (Fish Lingcod: 9mcg vs 0mcg), Thiamin (B1) (Pork Loin Backribs Bone-in Lean Only: 0.496mg vs 0.03mg), Vitamin B12 (Fish Lingcod: 3.6mcg vs 0.54mcg).

Key Minerals: Notable mineral differences include Zinc (Pork Loin Backribs Bone-in Lean Only: 2.73mg vs 0.45mg), Copper (Pork Loin Backribs Bone-in Lean Only: 0.091mg vs 0.027mg), Iron (Pork Loin Backribs Bone-in Lean Only: 0.84mg vs 0.32mg).

Diet Suitability: Both fit a low-carb or keto diet. Pork Loin Backribs Bone-in Lean Only fits a high-protein diet. Fish Lingcod fits a low-fat diet. Both fit a low-sodium diet.

🔗Related Comparisons

Data from USDA FoodData Central. All values per 100g.