Fish LingcodvsFish Mackerel Salted
ðŊWhen to Eat What
Goal-based picks for Fish Lingcod vs Fish Mackerel Salted
Go with Fish Lingcod at just 85 kcal per 100g â 72% fewer calories.
Fish Mackerel Salted will keep you satisfied longer with 18.5g protein, 25.1g fat â fat and protein slow digestion while fiber adds bulk, keeping hunger at bay.
Fish Lingcod is the heart-friendlier option with lower saturated fat, less sodium.
Fish Mackerel Salted provides 520mg of potassium per 100g â important for muscle function, hydration, and blood pressure.
Fish Mackerel Salted provides 66mg of calcium per 100g â a much better source for bone health.
ðĨCalorie Breakdown
ðŠMacronutrient Comparison
ðFull Nutrition Comparison
| Nutrient | Fish Lingcod | Fish Mackerel Salted | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| ðŠMacronutrients | |||
| Calories | 85kcal4% | 305kcal15% | <0.1kcal |
| Protein | 18g35% | 19g37% | <0.1g |
| Total Fat | 1.1g1% | 25g32% | <0.1g |
| Saturated Fat | 0.20g1% | 7.2g36% | <0.1g |
| Cholesterol | 52mg17% | 95mg32% | <0.1mg |
| Carbohydrates | 0g0% | 0g0% | â |
| Dietary Fiber | 0g0% | 0g0% | â |
| Sugars | â | 0g | â |
| âĻVitamins | |||
| Vitamin A | 15mcg2% | 47mcg5% | <0.1mcg |
| Vitamin C | 0mg0% | 0mg0% | â |
| Vitamin D | â | 25mcg126% | â |
| Vitamin E | â | 2.4mg16% | â |
| Vitamin K | â | 7.8mcg7% | â |
| Vitamin B6 | 0.30mg18% | 0.41mg24% | <0.1mg |
| Vitamin B12 | 3.6mcg150% | 12mcg500% | <0.1mcg |
| Folate | 9.0mcg2% | 15mcg4% | <0.1mcg |
| Thiamin (B1) | <0.1mg3% | <0.1mg2% | +<0.1mg |
| Riboflavin (B2) | 0.11mg9% | 0.19mg15% | <0.1mg |
| Niacin (B3) | 1.9mg12% | 3.3mg21% | <0.1mg |
| ðķMinerals | |||
| Sodium | 59mg3% | 4450mg193% | <0.1mg |
| Calcium | 14mg1% | 66mg5% | <0.1mg |
| Iron | 0.32mg2% | 1.4mg8% | <0.1mg |
| Potassium | 437mg9% | 520mg11% | <0.1mg |
| Phosphorus | 201mg16% | 254mg20% | <0.1mg |
| Magnesium | 26mg6% | 60mg14% | <0.1mg |
| Zinc | 0.45mg4% | 1.1mg10% | <0.1mg |
| Copper | <0.1mg3% | 0.10mg11% | <0.1mg |
| Manganese | <0.1mg1% | â | â |
| Selenium | 37mcg66% | 73mcg133% | <0.1mcg |
ðŽNutritional Analysis
Calories: Fish Lingcod is significantly lower in calories at just 85 kcal per 100g compared to 305 kcal for Fish Mackerel Salted â that's 259% fewer calories, making Fish Lingcod the better choice for calorie-conscious diets.
Protein: Both are similar in protein content, with Fish Lingcod providing 17.7g and Fish Mackerel Salted providing 18.5g per 100g.
Fat: Fish Lingcod is the leaner option with 1.06g of total fat per 100g compared to 25.1g. Fish Lingcod has less saturated fat (0.197g vs 7.15g).
Key Vitamins: The most notable vitamin differences are in Vitamin B12 (Fish Mackerel Salted: 12mcg vs 3.6mcg), Vitamin A (Fish Mackerel Salted: 47mcg vs 15mcg), Niacin (B3) (Fish Mackerel Salted: 3.3mg vs 1.9mg).
Key Minerals: Notable mineral differences include Sodium (Fish Mackerel Salted: 4450mg vs 59mg), Calcium (Fish Mackerel Salted: 66mg vs 14mg), Iron (Fish Mackerel Salted: 1.4mg vs 0.32mg).
Diet Suitability: Both fit a low-carb or keto diet. Fish Lingcod fits a low-fat diet. Fish Lingcod fits a low-sodium diet.