Fish LingcodvsSugars Brown
ðŊWhen to Eat What
Goal-based picks for Fish Lingcod vs Sugars Brown
Go with Fish Lingcod at just 85 kcal per 100g â 78% fewer calories.
Fish Lingcod will keep you satisfied longer with 17.7g protein â fat and protein slow digestion while fiber adds bulk, keeping hunger at bay.
Fish Lingcod packs 17.7g of protein per 100g (83% of calories from protein) â the better pick for muscle growth and recovery.
Sugars Brown with 98g of carbs per 100g provides fast-acting energy â a good pick before a workout or when you need a quick boost.
Fish Lingcod provides 437mg of potassium per 100g â important for muscle function, hydration, and blood pressure.
Sugars Brown provides 83mg of calcium per 100g â a much better source for bone health.
ðĨCalorie Breakdown
ðŠMacronutrient Comparison
ðFull Nutrition Comparison
| Nutrient | Fish Lingcod | Sugars Brown | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| ðŠMacronutrients | |||
| Calories | 85kcal4% | 380kcal19% | <0.1kcal |
| Protein | 18g35% | 0.12g0% | +18g |
| Total Fat | 1.1g1% | 0g0% | +1.1g |
| Saturated Fat | 0.20g1% | 0g0% | +0.20g |
| Cholesterol | 52mg17% | 0mg0% | +52mg |
| Carbohydrates | 0g0% | 98g36% | <0.1g |
| Dietary Fiber | 0g0% | 0g0% | â |
| Sugars | â | 97g | â |
| âĻVitamins | |||
| Vitamin A | 15mcg2% | 0mcg0% | +15mcg |
| Vitamin C | 0mg0% | 0mg0% | â |
| Vitamin D | â | 0mcg0% | â |
| Vitamin E | â | 0mg0% | â |
| Vitamin K | â | 0mcg0% | â |
| Vitamin B6 | 0.30mg18% | <0.1mg2% | +0.26mg |
| Vitamin B12 | 3.6mcg150% | 0mcg0% | +3.6mcg |
| Folate | 9.0mcg2% | 1.0mcg0% | +8.0mcg |
| Thiamin (B1) | <0.1mg3% | 0mg0% | +<0.1mg |
| Riboflavin (B2) | 0.11mg9% | 0mg0% | +0.11mg |
| Niacin (B3) | 1.9mg12% | 0.11mg1% | +1.8mg |
| ðķMinerals | |||
| Sodium | 59mg3% | 28mg1% | +31mg |
| Calcium | 14mg1% | 83mg6% | <0.1mg |
| Iron | 0.32mg2% | 0.71mg4% | <0.1mg |
| Potassium | 437mg9% | 133mg3% | +304mg |
| Phosphorus | 201mg16% | 4.0mg0% | +197mg |
| Magnesium | 26mg6% | 9.0mg2% | +17mg |
| Zinc | 0.45mg4% | <0.1mg0% | +0.42mg |
| Copper | <0.1mg3% | <0.1mg5% | <0.1mg |
| Manganese | <0.1mg1% | <0.1mg3% | <0.1mg |
| Selenium | 37mcg66% | 1.2mcg2% | +35mcg |
ðŽNutritional Analysis
Calories: Fish Lingcod is significantly lower in calories at just 85 kcal per 100g compared to 380 kcal for Sugars Brown â that's 347% fewer calories, making Fish Lingcod the better choice for calorie-conscious diets.
Protein: Fish Lingcod provides more protein with 17.7g versus 0.12g per 100g. In terms of protein-to-calorie efficiency, Fish Lingcod offers better value for building and maintaining muscle.
Fat: Fish Lingcod has more fat (1.06g vs 0g per 100g), but the combination of fat and protein makes it more satiating â dietary fat helps absorb fat-soluble vitamins (A, D, E, K) and supports hormone balance.
Key Vitamins: The most notable vitamin differences are in Vitamin A (Fish Lingcod: 15mcg vs 0mcg), Vitamin B12 (Fish Lingcod: 3.6mcg vs 0mcg), Thiamin (B1) (Fish Lingcod: 0.03mg vs 0mg).
Key Minerals: Notable mineral differences include Phosphorus (Fish Lingcod: 201mg vs 4mg), Selenium (Fish Lingcod: 36.5mcg vs 1.2mcg), Zinc (Fish Lingcod: 0.45mg vs 0.03mg).
Diet Suitability: Fish Lingcod fits a low-carb or keto diet. Both fit a low-fat diet. Both fit a low-sodium diet.