Fish Tuna SaladvsSugars Brown
ðŊWhen to Eat What
Goal-based picks for Fish Tuna Salad vs Sugars Brown
Go with Fish Tuna Salad at just 187 kcal per 100g â 51% fewer calories.
Fish Tuna Salad will keep you satisfied longer with 16g protein, 9.26g fat â fat and protein slow digestion while fiber adds bulk, keeping hunger at bay.
Fish Tuna Salad packs 16g of protein per 100g (34% of calories from protein) â the better pick for muscle growth and recovery.
Sugars Brown with 98g of carbs per 100g provides fast-acting energy â a good pick before a workout or when you need a quick boost.
Sugars Brown is the heart-friendlier option with lower saturated fat, less sodium.
Sugars Brown provides 83mg of calcium per 100g â a much better source for bone health.
ðĨCalorie Breakdown
ðŠMacronutrient Comparison
ðFull Nutrition Comparison
| Nutrient | Fish Tuna Salad | Sugars Brown | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| ðŠMacronutrients | |||
| Calories | 187kcal9% | 380kcal19% | <0.1kcal |
| Protein | 16g32% | 0.12g0% | +16g |
| Total Fat | 9.3g12% | 0g0% | +9.3g |
| Saturated Fat | 1.5g8% | 0g0% | +1.5g |
| Cholesterol | 13mg4% | 0mg0% | +13mg |
| Carbohydrates | 9.4g3% | 98g36% | <0.1g |
| Dietary Fiber | 0g0% | 0g0% | â |
| Sugars | â | 97g | â |
| âĻVitamins | |||
| Vitamin A | 24mcg3% | 0mcg0% | +24mcg |
| Vitamin C | 2.2mg2% | 0mg0% | +2.2mg |
| Vitamin D | â | 0mcg0% | â |
| Vitamin E | â | 0mg0% | â |
| Vitamin K | â | 0mcg0% | â |
| Vitamin B6 | <0.1mg5% | <0.1mg2% | +<0.1mg |
| Vitamin B12 | 1.2mcg50% | 0mcg0% | +1.2mcg |
| Folate | 8.0mcg2% | 1.0mcg0% | +7.0mcg |
| Thiamin (B1) | <0.1mg3% | 0mg0% | +<0.1mg |
| Riboflavin (B2) | <0.1mg5% | 0mg0% | +<0.1mg |
| Niacin (B3) | 6.7mg42% | 0.11mg1% | +6.6mg |
| ðķMinerals | |||
| Sodium | 402mg17% | 28mg1% | +374mg |
| Calcium | 17mg1% | 83mg6% | <0.1mg |
| Iron | 1.0mg6% | 0.71mg4% | +0.29mg |
| Potassium | 178mg4% | 133mg3% | +45mg |
| Phosphorus | 178mg14% | 4.0mg0% | +174mg |
| Magnesium | 19mg5% | 9.0mg2% | +10mg |
| Zinc | 0.56mg5% | <0.1mg0% | +0.53mg |
| Copper | 0.14mg16% | <0.1mg5% | +<0.1mg |
| Manganese | <0.1mg2% | <0.1mg3% | <0.1mg |
| Selenium | 41mcg75% | 1.2mcg2% | +40mcg |
ðŽNutritional Analysis
Calories: Fish Tuna Salad is significantly lower in calories at just 187 kcal per 100g compared to 380 kcal for Sugars Brown â that's 103% fewer calories, making Fish Tuna Salad the better choice for calorie-conscious diets.
Protein: Fish Tuna Salad provides more protein with 16g versus 0.12g per 100g. In terms of protein-to-calorie efficiency, Fish Tuna Salad offers better value for building and maintaining muscle.
Fat: Fish Tuna Salad has more fat (9.26g vs 0g per 100g), but the combination of fat and protein makes it more satiating â dietary fat helps absorb fat-soluble vitamins (A, D, E, K) and supports hormone balance. Sugars Brown has less saturated fat (0g vs 1.54g).
Key Vitamins: The most notable vitamin differences are in Vitamin A (Fish Tuna Salad: 24mcg vs 0mcg), Vitamin C (Fish Tuna Salad: 2.2mg vs 0mg), Vitamin B12 (Fish Tuna Salad: 1.2mcg vs 0mcg).
Key Minerals: Notable mineral differences include Phosphorus (Fish Tuna Salad: 178mg vs 4mg), Selenium (Fish Tuna Salad: 41.2mcg vs 1.2mcg), Zinc (Fish Tuna Salad: 0.56mg vs 0.03mg).
Diet Suitability: Sugars Brown fits a low-fat diet. Sugars Brown fits a low-sodium diet.