Fish LingcodvsSoybeans Green

Fish Lingcod has more protein, Fish Lingcod is lower in calories, while Soybeans Green has more healthy fats for satiety.

🎯When to Eat What

Goal-based picks for Fish Lingcod vs Soybeans Green

⚖️Watching your weight

Go with Fish Lingcod at just 85 kcal per 100g — 42% fewer calories.

🫄Staying full longer

Soybeans Green will keep you satisfied longer with 4.2g fiber, 13g protein, 6.8g fat — fat and protein slow digestion while fiber adds bulk, keeping hunger at bay.

🥛Nutrient absorption

Soybeans Green's natural fat (6.8g/100g) helps your body absorb fat-soluble nutrients like calcium — not all fat is bad, moderate amounts are essential.

🔄Iron absorption

Soybeans Green has both iron (3.55mg) and vitamin C (29mg) — vitamin C can boost iron absorption by up to 6x, making this a naturally efficient pairing.

💪Building muscle

Fish Lingcod packs 17.7g of protein per 100g (83% of calories from protein) — the better pick for muscle growth and recovery.

❤️Heart health

Soybeans Green is the heart-friendlier option with less sodium, more fiber, more potassium.

🔥Calorie Breakdown

Fish Lingcod
85kcal
Protein88%
Carbs0%
Fat12%
Soybeans Green
147kcal
Protein33%
Carbs28%
Fat39%

💪Macronutrient Comparison

Fish LingcodSoybeans Green
ProteinA Wins
18g
13g
CarbohydratesB Wins
0g
11g
Total FatA Wins
1.1g
6.8g
Dietary FiberB Wins
0g
4.2g

📊Full Nutrition Comparison

NutrientFish LingcodSoybeans GreenDiff
💪Macronutrients
Calories85kcal4%147kcal7%<0.1kcal
Protein18g35%13g26%+4.7g
Total Fat1.1g1%6.8g9%<0.1g
Saturated Fat0.20g1%0.79g4%<0.1g
Trans Fat0g
Cholesterol52mg17%0mg0%+52mg
Carbohydrates0g0%11g4%<0.1g
Dietary Fiber0g0%4.2g15%<0.1g
Vitamins
Vitamin A15mcg2%9.0mcg1%+6.0mcg
Vitamin C0mg0%29mg32%<0.1mg
Vitamin D0mcg0%
Vitamin B60.30mg18%<0.1mg4%+0.23mg
Vitamin B123.6mcg150%0mcg0%+3.6mcg
Folate9.0mcg2%165mcg41%<0.1mcg
Thiamin (B1)<0.1mg3%0.43mg36%<0.1mg
Riboflavin (B2)0.11mg9%0.17mg13%<0.1mg
Niacin (B3)1.9mg12%1.6mg10%+0.25mg
🔶Minerals
Sodium59mg3%15mg1%+44mg
Calcium14mg1%197mg15%<0.1mg
Iron0.32mg2%3.5mg20%<0.1mg
Potassium437mg9%620mg13%<0.1mg
Phosphorus201mg16%194mg16%+7.0mg
Magnesium26mg6%65mg15%<0.1mg
Zinc0.45mg4%0.99mg9%<0.1mg
Copper<0.1mg3%0.13mg14%<0.1mg
Manganese<0.1mg1%0.55mg24%<0.1mg
Selenium37mcg66%1.5mcg3%+35mcg

🔬Nutritional Analysis

Calories: Fish Lingcod is significantly lower in calories at just 85 kcal per 100g compared to 147 kcal for Soybeans Green — that's 73% fewer calories, making Fish Lingcod the better choice for calorie-conscious diets.

Protein: Fish Lingcod provides more protein with 17.7g versus 13g per 100g. In terms of protein-to-calorie efficiency, Fish Lingcod offers better value for building and maintaining muscle.

Fat: Soybeans Green has more fat (6.8g vs 1.06g per 100g), but the combination of fat and protein makes it more satiating — dietary fat helps absorb fat-soluble vitamins (A, D, E, K) and supports hormone balance.

Key Vitamins: The most notable vitamin differences are in Vitamin C (Soybeans Green: 29mg vs 0mg), Vitamin B12 (Fish Lingcod: 3.6mcg vs 0mcg), Folate (Soybeans Green: 165mcg vs 9mcg).

Key Minerals: Notable mineral differences include Selenium (Fish Lingcod: 36.5mcg vs 1.5mcg), Manganese (Soybeans Green: 0.547mg vs 0.02mg), Calcium (Soybeans Green: 197mg vs 14mg).

Diet Suitability: Fish Lingcod fits a low-carb or keto diet. Fish Lingcod fits a low-fat diet. Both fit a low-sodium diet.

🔗Related Comparisons

Data from USDA FoodData Central. All values per 100g.