Fish LingcodvsNuts Pistachio Nuts

Nuts Pistachio Nuts has more protein, Fish Lingcod is lower in calories, while Fish Lingcod is leaner.

ðŸŽŊWhen to Eat What

Goal-based picks for Fish Lingcod vs Nuts Pistachio Nuts

⚖ïļWatching your weight

Go with Fish Lingcod at just 85 kcal per 100g — 85% fewer calories.

ðŸŦ„Staying full longer

Nuts Pistachio Nuts will keep you satisfied longer with 10.6g fiber, 20.2g protein, 45.3g fat — fat and protein slow digestion while fiber adds bulk, keeping hunger at bay.

🔄Iron absorption

Nuts Pistachio Nuts has both iron (3.92mg) and vitamin C (6mg) — vitamin C can boost iron absorption by up to 6x, making this a naturally efficient pairing.

âĪïļHeart health

Nuts Pistachio Nuts is the heart-friendlier option with less sodium, more fiber, more potassium.

🍌Electrolytes & cramp prevention

Nuts Pistachio Nuts provides 1020mg of potassium per 100g — important for muscle function, hydration, and blood pressure.

ðŸĶīBone strength

Nuts Pistachio Nuts provides 105mg of calcium per 100g — a much better source for bone health.

ðŸ”ĨCalorie Breakdown

Fish Lingcod
85kcal
Protein88%
Carbs0%
Fat12%
Nuts Pistachio Nuts
560kcal
Protein14%
Carbs18%
Fat68%

💊Macronutrient Comparison

Fish LingcodNuts Pistachio Nuts
ProteinB Wins
18g
20g
CarbohydratesB Wins
0g
27g
Total FatA Wins
1.1g
45g
Dietary FiberB Wins
0g
11g

📊Full Nutrition Comparison

NutrientFish LingcodNuts Pistachio NutsDiff
💊Macronutrients
Calories85kcal4%560kcal28%<0.1kcal
Protein18g35%20g40%<0.1g
Total Fat1.1g1%45g58%<0.1g
Saturated Fat0.20g1%5.9g30%<0.1g
Trans Fat—0g—
Cholesterol52mg17%0mg0%+52mg
Carbohydrates0g0%27g10%<0.1g
Dietary Fiber0g0%11g38%<0.1g
Sugars—7.7g—
âœĻVitamins
Vitamin A15mcg2%26mcg3%<0.1mcg
Vitamin C0mg0%5.6mg6%<0.1mg
Vitamin D—0mcg0%—
Vitamin E—2.9mg19%—
Vitamin B60.30mg18%1.7mg100%<0.1mg
Vitamin B123.6mcg150%0mcg0%+3.6mcg
Folate9.0mcg2%51mcg13%<0.1mcg
Thiamin (B1)<0.1mg3%0.87mg73%<0.1mg
Riboflavin (B2)0.11mg9%0.16mg12%<0.1mg
Niacin (B3)1.9mg12%1.3mg8%+0.60mg
ðŸ”ķMinerals
Sodium59mg3%1.0mg0%+58mg
Calcium14mg1%105mg8%<0.1mg
Iron0.32mg2%3.9mg22%<0.1mg
Potassium437mg9%1020mg22%<0.1mg
Phosphorus201mg16%490mg39%<0.1mg
Magnesium26mg6%121mg29%<0.1mg
Zinc0.45mg4%2.2mg20%<0.1mg
Copper<0.1mg3%1.3mg144%<0.1mg
Manganese<0.1mg1%1.2mg52%<0.1mg
Selenium37mcg66%7.0mcg13%+30mcg

🔎Nutritional Analysis

Calories: Fish Lingcod is significantly lower in calories at just 85 kcal per 100g compared to 560 kcal for Nuts Pistachio Nuts — that's 559% fewer calories, making Fish Lingcod the better choice for calorie-conscious diets.

Protein: Nuts Pistachio Nuts provides more protein with 20.2g versus 17.7g per 100g. In terms of protein-to-calorie efficiency, Fish Lingcod offers better value for building and maintaining muscle.

Fat: Fish Lingcod is the leaner option with 1.06g of total fat per 100g compared to 45.3g. Fish Lingcod has less saturated fat (0.197g vs 5.91g).

Key Vitamins: The most notable vitamin differences are in Vitamin C (Nuts Pistachio Nuts: 5.6mg vs 0mg), Vitamin B12 (Fish Lingcod: 3.6mcg vs 0mcg), Thiamin (B1) (Nuts Pistachio Nuts: 0.87mg vs 0.03mg).

Key Minerals: Notable mineral differences include Sodium (Fish Lingcod: 59mg vs 1mg), Copper (Nuts Pistachio Nuts: 1.3mg vs 0.027mg), Manganese (Nuts Pistachio Nuts: 1.2mg vs 0.02mg).

Diet Suitability: Fish Lingcod fits a low-carb or keto diet. Nuts Pistachio Nuts fits a high-protein diet. Fish Lingcod fits a low-fat diet. Both fit a low-sodium diet. Nuts Pistachio Nuts fits a high-fiber diet.

🔗Related Comparisons

Data from USDA FoodData Central. All values per 100g.