Crustaceans Lobster NorthernvsFish Lingcod
ðŊWhen to Eat What
Goal-based picks for Crustaceans Lobster Northern vs Fish Lingcod
Fish Lingcod is the heart-friendlier option with less sodium, more potassium.
Crustaceans Lobster Northern has 127mg cholesterol per 100g, but current research shows dietary cholesterol has minimal effect on blood cholesterol for most people â it's saturated and trans fats that matter more.
Fish Lingcod provides 437mg of potassium per 100g â important for muscle function, hydration, and blood pressure.
Crustaceans Lobster Northern provides 84mg of calcium per 100g â a much better source for bone health.
ðĨCalorie Breakdown
ðŠMacronutrient Comparison
ðFull Nutrition Comparison
| Nutrient | Crustaceans Lobster Northern | Fish Lingcod | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| ðŠMacronutrients | |||
| Calories | 77kcal4% | 85kcal4% | <0.1kcal |
| Protein | 17g33% | 18g35% | <0.1g |
| Total Fat | 0.75g1% | 1.1g1% | <0.1g |
| Saturated Fat | 0.18g1% | 0.20g1% | <0.1g |
| Trans Fat | <0.1g | â | â |
| Cholesterol | 127mg42% | 52mg17% | +75mg |
| Carbohydrates | 0g0% | 0g0% | â |
| Dietary Fiber | 0g0% | 0g0% | â |
| Sugars | 0g | â | â |
| âĻVitamins | |||
| Vitamin A | 1.0mcg0% | 15mcg2% | <0.1mcg |
| Vitamin C | 0mg0% | 0mg0% | â |
| Vitamin D | 0mcg0% | â | â |
| Vitamin E | 0.87mg6% | â | â |
| Vitamin K | 0mcg0% | â | â |
| Vitamin B6 | 0.10mg6% | 0.30mg18% | <0.1mg |
| Vitamin B12 | 1.3mcg52% | 3.6mcg150% | <0.1mcg |
| Folate | 10mcg3% | 9.0mcg2% | +1.0mcg |
| Thiamin (B1) | <0.1mg2% | <0.1mg3% | <0.1mg |
| Riboflavin (B2) | <0.1mg1% | 0.11mg9% | <0.1mg |
| Niacin (B3) | 1.6mg10% | 1.9mg12% | <0.1mg |
| ðķMinerals | |||
| Sodium | 423mg18% | 59mg3% | +364mg |
| Calcium | 84mg6% | 14mg1% | +70mg |
| Iron | 0.26mg1% | 0.32mg2% | <0.1mg |
| Potassium | 200mg4% | 437mg9% | <0.1mg |
| Phosphorus | 161mg13% | 201mg16% | <0.1mg |
| Magnesium | 38mg9% | 26mg6% | +12mg |
| Zinc | 3.5mg32% | 0.45mg4% | +3.1mg |
| Copper | 1.4mg150% | <0.1mg3% | +1.3mg |
| Manganese | <0.1mg2% | <0.1mg1% | +<0.1mg |
| Selenium | 64mcg116% | 37mcg66% | +27mcg |
ðŽNutritional Analysis
Calories: Crustaceans Lobster Northern is moderately lower in calories than Fish Lingcod, containing 77 kcal compared to 85 kcal per 100g (10% fewer calories).
Protein: Fish Lingcod provides more protein with 17.7g versus 16.5g per 100g. In terms of protein-to-calorie efficiency, Crustaceans Lobster Northern offers better value for building and maintaining muscle.
Fat: Fish Lingcod has more fat (1.06g vs 0.75g per 100g), but the combination of fat and protein makes it more satiating â dietary fat helps absorb fat-soluble vitamins (A, D, E, K) and supports hormone balance.
Key Vitamins: The most notable vitamin differences are in Vitamin A (Fish Lingcod: 15mcg vs 1mcg), Riboflavin (B2) (Fish Lingcod: 0.114mg vs 0.014mg), Vitamin B6 (Fish Lingcod: 0.3mg vs 0.104mg).
Key Minerals: Notable mineral differences include Copper (Crustaceans Lobster Northern: 1.35mg vs 0.027mg), Zinc (Crustaceans Lobster Northern: 3.53mg vs 0.45mg), Sodium (Crustaceans Lobster Northern: 423mg vs 59mg).
Diet Suitability: Both fit a low-carb or keto diet. Both fit a low-fat diet. Fish Lingcod fits a low-sodium diet.