Apples With Skin (Raw)vsRaspberries (Raw)
Apples With Skin (Raw) has 52 calories and 0.26g protein per 100g. Raspberries (Raw) has 52 calories and 1.2g protein per 100g Raspberries (Raw) has more protein.
🎯When to Eat What
Goal-based picks for Apples With Skin (Raw) vs Raspberries (Raw)
Raspberries (Raw) will keep you satisfied longer with 6.5g fiber — fat and protein slow digestion while fiber adds bulk.
Raspberries (Raw) is the heart-friendlier option with lower saturated fat, more fiber, more potassium.
Raspberries (Raw) delivers 26.2mg of vitamin C per 100g — great for immune function and skin health.
Raspberries (Raw) edges ahead overall with more fiber, less sugar, more vitamin C — the more nutritious option for everyday eating.
🔥Calorie Breakdown
💪Macronutrient Comparison
🕸️Nutrient Profile
Values as % of Daily Value (capped at 150%)
📊Full Nutrition Comparison
| Nutrient | Apples With Skin | Raspberries | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💪Macronutrients | |||
| Calories | 52kcal3% | 52kcal3% | — |
| Protein | 0.26g1% | 1.2g2% | <0.1g |
| Total Fat | 0.17g0% | 0.65g1% | <0.1g |
| Saturated Fat | <0.1g0% | <0.1g0% | +<0.1g |
| Trans Fat | 0g | 0g | — |
| Cholesterol | 0mg0% | 0mg0% | — |
| Carbohydrates | 14g5% | 12g4% | +1.9g |
| Dietary Fiber | 2.4g9% | 6.5g23% | <0.1g |
| Sugars | 10g | 4.4g | +6.0g |
| ✨Vitamins | |||
| Vitamin A | 3.0mcg0% | 2.0mcg0% | +1.0mcg |
| Vitamin C | 4.6mg5% | 26mg29% | <0.1mg |
| Vitamin D | 0mcg0% | 0mcg0% | — |
| Vitamin E | 0.18mg1% | 0.87mg6% | <0.1mg |
| Vitamin K | 2.2mcg2% | 7.8mcg7% | <0.1mcg |
| Vitamin B6 | <0.1mg2% | <0.1mg3% | <0.1mg |
| Vitamin B12 | 0mcg0% | 0mcg0% | — |
| Folate | 3.0mcg1% | 21mcg5% | <0.1mcg |
| Thiamin (B1) | <0.1mg1% | <0.1mg3% | <0.1mg |
| Riboflavin (B2) | <0.1mg2% | <0.1mg3% | <0.1mg |
| Niacin (B3) | <0.1mg1% | 0.60mg4% | <0.1mg |
| 🔶Minerals | |||
| Sodium | 1.0mg0% | 1.0mg0% | — |
| Calcium | 6.0mg0% | 25mg2% | <0.1mg |
| Iron | 0.12mg1% | 0.69mg4% | <0.1mg |
| Potassium | 107mg2% | 151mg3% | <0.1mg |
| Phosphorus | 11mg1% | 29mg2% | <0.1mg |
| Magnesium | 5.0mg1% | 22mg5% | <0.1mg |
| Zinc | <0.1mg0% | 0.42mg4% | <0.1mg |
| Copper | <0.1mg3% | <0.1mg10% | <0.1mg |
| Manganese | <0.1mg2% | 0.67mg29% | <0.1mg |
| Selenium | 0mcg0% | 0.20mcg0% | <0.1mcg |
🔬Nutritional Analysis
Calories: Apples With Skin (Raw) and Raspberries (Raw) have nearly identical calorie content at 52 and 52 kcal per 100g respectively.
Protein: Both are similar in protein content, with Apples With Skin (Raw) providing 0.26g and Raspberries (Raw) providing 1.2g per 100g.
Fat: Apples With Skin (Raw) is the leaner option with 0.17g of total fat per 100g compared to 0.65g.
Key Vitamins: The most notable vitamin differences are in Folate (Raspberries (Raw): 21mcg vs 3mcg), Niacin (B3) (Raspberries (Raw): 0.598mg vs 0.091mg), Vitamin C (Raspberries (Raw): 26.2mg vs 4.6mg).
Key Minerals: Notable mineral differences include Selenium (Raspberries (Raw): 0.2mcg vs 0mcg), Manganese (Raspberries (Raw): 0.67mg vs 0.035mg), Zinc (Raspberries (Raw): 0.42mg vs 0.04mg).
Diet Suitability: Both fit a low-fat diet. Both fit a low-sodium diet. Raspberries (Raw) fits a high-fiber diet.
🔗Related Comparisons
More with Apples With Skin
More with Raspberries
❓Frequently Asked Questions
- Which has more protein, Apples With Skin (Raw) or Raspberries (Raw)?
- Raspberries (Raw) has more protein with 1.2g per 100g compared to 0.26g for Apples With Skin (Raw).
- Which is lower in calories, Apples With Skin (Raw) or Raspberries (Raw)?
- Both have 52 calories per 100g.
- Is Apples With Skin (Raw) or Raspberries (Raw) healthier?
- It depends on your goals. Apples With Skin (Raw) has 52 calories and 0.26g protein per 100g, while Raspberries (Raw) has 52 calories and 1.2g protein. Compare their full nutrition profiles to decide which fits your diet.
- Which has less fat, Apples With Skin (Raw) or Raspberries (Raw)?
- Apples With Skin (Raw) is leaner with 0.17g of fat per 100g compared to 0.65g.
- Which has more fiber, Apples With Skin (Raw) or Raspberries (Raw)?
- Raspberries (Raw) has more fiber with 6.5g per 100g compared to 2.4g.