TunavsHam Sliced

Tuna has more protein, while Ham Sliced is lower in calories.

Tuna has 198 calories and 29g protein per 100g. Ham Sliced has 164 calories and 17g protein per 100g Tuna has more protein, Ham Sliced is lower in calories.

🎯When to Eat What

Goal-based picks for Tuna vs Ham Sliced

βš–οΈWatching your weight

Go with Ham Sliced at just 164 kcal per 100g β€” 17% fewer calories.

πŸ«„Staying full longer

Tuna will keep you satisfied longer with 29.1g protein, 8.2g fat β€” fat and protein slow digestion while fiber adds bulk.

πŸ’ͺBuilding muscle

Tuna packs 29.1g of protein per 100g (59% of calories from protein) β€” the better pick for muscle growth and recovery.

🍌Electrolytes & cramp prevention

Ham Sliced provides 287mg of potassium per 100g β€” important for muscle function and hydration.

⚠️Things to Watch

Tuna

High in sodium at 416mg per 100g, so it may not be the best fit for a low-sodium diet.

Ham Sliced

High in sodium at 814mg per 100g, so it may not be the best fit for a low-sodium diet.

πŸ”₯Calorie Breakdown

Tuna
198kcal
Protein61%
Carbs0%
Fat39%
Ham Sliced
164kcal
Protein41%
Carbs9%
Fat50%

πŸ’ͺMacronutrient Comparison

TunaHam Sliced
Proteinβœ“ Tuna
29g
17g
Carbohydratesβœ“ Ham Sliced
0g
3.6g
Total Fatβœ“ Tuna
8.2g
8.8g
Dietary Fiberβœ“ Ham Sliced
0g
1.3g

πŸ•ΈοΈNutrient Profile

Protein58% Β· 33%Fiber0% Β· 5%Vit C0% Β· 4%Iron8% Β· 6%Calcium1% Β· 2%Potassium4% Β· 6%Vit A3% Β· 0%Magnesium7% Β· 5%
Tuna
Ham Sliced

Values as % of Daily Value (capped at 150%)

πŸ“ŠFull Nutrition Comparison

NutrientFish Tuna Light Canned In Oil Drained SolidsHam Sliced Regular (approximately 11% Fat)Diff
πŸ’ͺMacronutrients
Calories198kcal10%164kcal8%+34kcal
Protein29g58%17g33%+13g
Total Fat8.2g11%8.8g11%<0.1g
Saturated Fat1.5g8%0.50g3%+1.0g
Cholesterol18mg6%57mg19%<0.1mg
Carbohydrates0g0%3.6g1%<0.1g
Dietary Fiber0g0%1.3g5%<0.1g
Sugars0g1.0g<0.1g
✨Vitamins
Vitamin A23mcg3%0mcg0%+23mcg
Vitamin C0mg0%4.0mg4%<0.1mg
Vitamin D6.7mcg34%0.70mcg3%+6.0mcg
Vitamin E0.87mg6%<0.1mg1%+0.79mg
Vitamin K44mcg37%0mcg0%+44mcg
Vitamin B60.11mg6%0.33mg19%<0.1mg
Vitamin B122.2mcg92%0.42mcg18%+1.8mcg
Folate5.0mcg1%7.0mcg2%<0.1mcg
Thiamin (B1)<0.1mg3%0.63mg52%<0.1mg
Riboflavin (B2)0.12mg9%0.18mg14%<0.1mg
Niacin (B3)12mg78%2.9mg18%+9.5mg
πŸ”ΆMinerals
Sodium416mg18%814mg35%<0.1mg
Calcium13mg1%24mg2%<0.1mg
Iron1.4mg8%1.0mg6%+0.37mg
Potassium207mg4%287mg6%<0.1mg
Phosphorus311mg25%153mg12%+158mg
Magnesium31mg7%22mg5%+9.0mg
Zinc0.90mg8%1.4mg12%<0.1mg
Copper<0.1mg8%<0.1mg10%<0.1mg
Manganese<0.1mg1%0.56mg24%<0.1mg
Selenium76mcg138%21mcg38%+55mcg

πŸ”¬Nutritional Analysis

Calories: Ham Sliced is moderately lower in calories than Tuna, containing 164 kcal compared to 198 kcal per 100g (21% fewer calories).

Protein: Tuna provides more protein with 29.1g versus 16.6g per 100g. In terms of protein-to-calorie efficiency, Tuna offers better value for building and maintaining muscle.

Fat: Both have similar fat content β€” Tuna has 8.21g and Ham Sliced has 8.8g per 100g.

Key Vitamins: The most notable vitamin differences are in Vitamin A (Tuna: 23mcg vs 0mcg), Vitamin C (Ham Sliced: 4mg vs 0mg), Vitamin K (Tuna: 44mcg vs 0mcg).

Key Minerals: Notable mineral differences include Manganese (Ham Sliced: 0.557mg vs 0.015mg), Selenium (Tuna: 76mcg vs 20.7mcg), Phosphorus (Tuna: 311mg vs 153mg).

Diet Suitability: Both fit a low-carb or keto diet. Tuna fits a high-protein diet.

πŸ”—Related Comparisons

❓Frequently Asked Questions

Which has more protein, Tuna or Ham Sliced?
Tuna has more protein with 29.1g per 100g compared to 16.6g for Ham Sliced.
Which is lower in calories, Tuna or Ham Sliced?
Ham Sliced is lower in calories with 164 kcal per 100g versus 198 kcal.
Is Tuna or Ham Sliced healthier?
It depends on your goals. Tuna has 198 calories and 29.1g protein per 100g, while Ham Sliced has 164 calories and 16.6g protein. Compare their full nutrition profiles to decide which fits your diet.
Which has less fat, Tuna or Ham Sliced?
Tuna is leaner with 8.21g of fat per 100g compared to 8.8g.
Which has more fiber, Tuna or Ham Sliced?
Ham Sliced has more fiber with 1.3g per 100g compared to 0g.
Data from USDA FoodData Central. All values per 100g.